Skip to main content

Privacy Online and Off

'online life, permanent as a tattoo':

I thought this Ted Talk was a very spot on simile for impacts on the internet. A lot of people think things just disappear, or people are not watching us. However, that is not the case in the digital world, things are permanent and there forever. I  was also very shocked to learn about websites like face.com and the facial profiling that is done based off of our social media. It is frightening to think that an innocent photo someone tags you in can result in your face being tracked and basically stalked by these websites to gather info about you.

'small details police track about us':

License plate tracking can be a very useful tool. You see it being used to track down cars that have kidnapped children, carrying criminals, etc. Because of this technology, many good things have come from it and it has been able to save people and make the world safer. However, I do not think the police/authority should have the right to use our license plates and track us without reasonable cause. If a person is under investigation for something, then yes, track their whereabouts. But if police are tracking someone because they go to a specific location often, that is an invasion of privacy.

'How to avoid surveillance ... with the phone in your pocket':

This Ted Talk came as a pleasant  surprise. I was shocked to learn that companies like Apple and Google were creating technology for their devices that made it impossible for government  officials  to wire tap and listen in on citizens texts, calls, etc. It comes has no surprise that the government is upset because they want total control.  However, as the man said, there are no "drug dealer phones" or "terrorists computer" so it is impossible to know what is going to happen on everyones devices. As stated before, I do not think the government  should be freely open to invade hack us and listen in without reasonable  cause, so I give Apple and Google credit for installing these programs that limit this.  Side note, this video was produced in 2012, I am curious to know what has changed since then


'How revenge porn turns lives upside down':

This Ted Talk made me particularly angry because it too common in this day and age. Revenge porn is a horrible thing that (mainly) happens to women and when it does, they are the ones that pay the price- losing their jobs, respect, and the struggle from the aftermath of it all. I think it is insane that there are no laws to to stop it. It is so wrong that someone can get away with a fine or misdemeanor for invading someones privacy like that. We live in such a digital age there is no reason as to why we dont have laws in place for this. Although the laws are stricter when a child is involved (nude photos are considered child porn) the same laws and control should be set for someone when they are of age. Just because someone is an adult, does not mean that their private photos can be posted. Revenge porn is a prime example of privacy invasion and should be better regulated.

Overall, I thought all of these Ted Talks made valid points and covered different areas of privacy and the cyber world. some of the things I was already aware of, others I was not. The videos also helped me gather more info and points off view on the topics. For example, License plate tracking is  uncalled for without reasonable cause but useful when needed. Also, I was impressed to learn that powerful tech companies are actually doing something to  protect our privacy from the government.  Lastly, I was frustrated to learn how little can be done for revenge porn victims and how authority figures are not working towards making any major changes to change this.  . All of the topics show in these videos are important and need to be handled in our world today because of how digital our society is.





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

EOTO pt. 2

While watching and listening to the other groups I learned many things. However, one topic I found particularly interesting was from group 1- the topic of an Echo Chamber. Before the presentation, I did know the term 'echo chamber', but I was familiar with the definition. The group member defined an echo chamber as a situation/group in which beliefs are amplified and reenforced in groups or organizations. Within these groups people share a common viewpoint and do not contradict each other but rather support and encourage. While presenting, the group pointed out that echo chambers can be very negative because they are sheltering and lead to polarization and bias opinions. I would for sure agree with this because when you don't allow yourself to be exposed to other ideas and thoughts, you are limiting yourself and your awareness for others. I think we live in such a diverse society with many different religions and cultures, and because of that, it is important to respe

Speech Theories

Out of the 8 values of free expression, number 7- Promotion Innovation sticks out to me and is something I value. Promotion Innovation is defined as, “A community in which free speech is valued and protected is likely to be a more energized, creative, interesting society as its citizens actively fulfill themselves in many diverse and interesting ways.” I believe that is true because every citizen has the right to express their voice/ opinion and have it valued. Also, without freedom of speech our society would be limited and boring; we would all be forced to do the same things and follow a leader along with his/her ideas. I also think this is the most inspiring because it is promoting creativity among citizens. Without people trying new things, being energized and creative, our world would lack passion and new ideas. This idea applies to technology, innovations, and other everyday things we use. Without creativity, we may not have a lot of things our society depends

The Progressive Era -Substance due Process

I think the Progressive Era was a helpful time for the U.S- establishing new acts and further protecting our constitutional rights. For example, a change that particularly should be noted is the change of Substance Due Process. This is the process by which the court "adds substance to the word liberty in the due process clause - including how one wants to run business and create new rights based on this" (Smith lecture 9/19). I think this a useful act to have because it supports our country's amendments and allows citizens to have more freedom and rights when operating businesses and practicing the 1st amendment. However, I think that this term is also somewhat of a grey area. Because it allows more freedom for people, some may take it too far and act out in hate, violence, etc. because they believe they are protected. One example of this would be people making threats to our country or threats to a certain race/ religious group. Because we live in such a violent world,